Evaluation Of Prelim

Due to absence, I did not have a specific role within the filming and editing stages of the prelim task, however, I was able to give constructive feedback to my group during the final stages of the editing phase, suggesting possible improvements to what they had already created in my absence. When I come onto completing the main task, I will make sure that I get involved much more and take up a specific role in both the filming and editing stages. I feel confident that the brief was met by my group during this prelim task and I understand that the tasks outlined within the brief were met also.

Below, you can clearly see the use of a 180 degree rule within the footage:

Over the shoulder of one character...

...And then over the shoulder of the other character!

Here, you can also see the use of Match-On-Action within the footage:

Walks through the door...

..And enters the room on the other side!









The Match-On-Action could have been made a little more clearer however. This could have been shown by filming her closing the door on the other side, which shows a clearer sense of this feature as well as helping the audience to fully identify that she has entered a new section of setting within the footage. The group decided to plan before going out to film. This was done in a storyboard form. Each individual shot is put together very well and blends in nicely, however there were some shots that the ASD could have been shortened slightly, highlighting the part where she walks into the room and towards the other character. Overall, I feel that the group has worked well on the prelim task and have stuck to the brief successfully.